Greene County, Indiana · Sunday, November 8, 2009
[SeMissourian.com] Fair ~ 55°F  
High: 70°F ~ Low: 49°F
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (3) Share link

UPDATED WITH LIVE VIDEO: Additional funds will help Linton Fire Department

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

(Photo)
(Photo by Nick Schneider) Linton Fire Department Chief Gary Tannehill spoke at the Linton City Council meeting Monday night. [Order this photo]

An emergency cost reimbursement ordinance for the Linton Fire Department was approved during the Linton City Council meeting Monday.

That means the LFD will get paid a minimum amount to respond to a fire or accident if the home or car owner has insurance.

Linton Fire Chief Gary Tannehill explained the need for the ordinance in a Tuesday interview with the Greene County Daily World.

"There's a clause in homeowner's insurance. It's automatically in there. You already pay for it. But, if we don't have an ordinance in effect we can't collect," Tannehill said. "The ordinance was passed to collect that (the money). It's something that the insurance already provides."

There's no additional charge to the home or car owner and there's no cost to the city, he said. The ordinance allows Emergency Services Billing Corporation to bill insurance companies after the department has worked a fire or accident.

"A lot of departments are doing this because of House Bill 1001," Tannehill said, noting recent cuts to police and fire department budgets.

Click on the arrow below to hear Linton Fire Chief Gary Tannehill explain the benefits of the Linton City Council passing the emergency cost reimbursement ordinance.(Greene County Daily World Video/Nick Schneider)

Fire Departments in Jasonville, Switz City and the eastern portion of the county are already on the bandwagon, Tannehill added.

"The money (collected) will go into an accumulated fund," he said, adding it can be used for training, equipment and other such departmental needs.

A fire department can collect a maximum of $500 per fire through the homeowner's insurance clause, he noted. The money collected from response to a vehicle accident varies.

"If we go out and some of our equipment gets damaged it doesn't fall back on the taxpayer. It can be billed to the insurance," Tannehill added.

But if you don't have insurance don't worry.

"We're not going to have the attorney go collect off of people that don't have insurance," Tannehill stressed.

Tannehill also stressed another need for the ordinance.

"The city had no ordinance intact during the Petro's fire," he said, noting a loss of money to the city due to the fire.

With this ordinance, the insurance company can be billed, he said.

"It's a way to relieve our budget a little bit," he added.

During the Monday meeting, Linton Mayor Tom Jones provided further details on the reason for the ordinance.

"I think it's a smart thing. There's been talk of this since 2004. We've been hunting for a third party vendor," he added.

The city lost $70,000-$80,000 after the Petro's fire, Jones said.

The LFD also lost several pieces of equipment, such as radios, while working the fire. It took a total of 2.5 million - 3 million gallons to extinguish the fire.

"We looked at it hard then and now we're putting it into place," Jones added.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on gcdailyworld.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Let's just hope they never have a reason to collect.

Firefighting is one of the few professions where I am glad to pay them not to work.

-- Posted by per moenia urbis on Tue, Jan 13, 2009, at 2:05 PM

No problem with the fee. Possible concern with method of collection. I am long toothed. All my many years I have been made aware of situations where the middle person has received fees that were exorbitant. IE. a classmate of mine sold fundraisers (candy) to schools ect.for little percentage going to them and lining his pockets.

I am not saying in this case this is happening; however the opportunity is present. We all want to think that all individuals are honest; however this always isn't the case. Someone needs to ask

percentage of collection fee ect.

PS the firefighters police ect. place themselves in harms way and are underpaid and under appreciated.

Keep up the good work.

-- Posted by pit on Wed, Jan 14, 2009, at 9:49 AM

Aren't they under a contract with the County where they are already paid? Can they be paid for a service in which they are paid to do, such as vehicle accidents? Collecting for house fires is no problem, but how is it possible for vehicle accidents?

-- Posted by changeitup on Thu, Jan 15, 2009, at 8:14 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.