Login | Register
[Greene County Daily World]
Greene County, Indiana ~ Friday, November 21, 2008
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (8)

Group witnessed someone in the river; Was it Betty Carlton?

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

A rural Jasonville woman doesn't know if the person she and several other people saw floating in the West Fork of the White River on a sunny Sunday evening earlier this month was a missing Bloomfield woman.

Heather Sciscoe isn't sure now if it was 41-year-old Betty Carlton, but at the time she said there was no reason to be alarmed or to contact law authorities.

At the time she didn't even know anyone was missing in or around the river.

And, it is not terribly unusual to see anyone swimming or floating in the White River on a warm summer day, she said.

Heather and her husband, James and several other friends and relatives had gathered for an evening of catfishing at a river cabin, located about 10 miles downstream from Bloomfield.

The group included three adult couples and three children.

Between 6 and 7 p.m. on Sunday, July 13, Heather Sciscoe said she noticed a person wearing either a black or orange lifejacket came floating by their fishing spot, which was located off of County Road 600W.

The river was high -- above flood stage -- that day, rising about two feet in the four hours the Sciscoe's were fishing. She's not sure how deep the water was in that location, but she did say the current was moving very swiftly.

"We didn't know if it a was guy or a girl. We never said it was her. And this person did have a lifejacket on," Heather told the Greene County Daily World in an interview on Tuesday. "I thought it (the lifejacket) was orange. My husband thinks it was black."

Heather continued, "My husband hollered twice 'Are you alright?' and they just looked at us and kept going."

No words were spoken by the person floating. The only thing visible above the water was the person's head.

"They weren't like floating with their body up (on top of the water). Their head was sticking up out of the water and they were floating down the river. It (the water) was moving pretty quick," she remembered.

Heather said she knows the person was alive at the time because they looked right at them.

"They acknowledged that we were there fishing and they were looking around," she recalled.

Sciscoe said seeing a person floating by concerned her, but she was quickly told by her husband that it was not unusual.

"It scared me because I wasn't around the river, so it scared me ... my husband asked 'Are you OK?' and they looked at us and looked back like they didn't care that we were there. Then they floated down a little bit and he hollered again 'Are you OK, do you need help?'. They just looked at us again. My first reaction was to call somebody for help. My husband grew up on the river and he said they did it all of the time. It's just something to do when you live at the river," Heather stated.

The next day she heard on the news that a woman was missing and it all clicked.

"I was like 'Oh my God'. I don't know that was her, but I wanted them (authorities) to know possibly if it was where I seen it," she said.

Sciscoe went to the Linton Police Department and told an officer what she had witnessed on the previous day. The LPD contacted Indiana Conservation Officer Greg Swanson, who later called her on the telephone.

"We reported that they had a lifejacket on and we didn't even know if it was her. We couldn't tell if it was a guy or a girl."

Indiana Conservation Officer's public information spokesman Max Winchell collaborated Sciscoe's version of what was observed.

"Witnesses say she seemed to be fine and responded to them. They were not concerned and did not feel it necessary to call law enforcement until they learned of the missing persons report on the news," Winchell stated.

Winchell said there is nothing new with the search for Carlton.

The Conservation officer pointed out that the river was searched extensively for four days after the woman was reported missing by a family member with no signs of her either in the water or on the bank.

Winchell said at this point this unusual case can not be called a drowning case.

"If there was a drowning it is unwitnessed. She was last seen in the river, but she was also seen alive and well. Whether she made it out or whether she drowned, at this point we don't know," Winchell told the Greene County Daily World on Tuesday afternoon.

The case has many unanswered questions and turns dating back to July 7 when officers answered a E-911 telephone call to her 208 South Seminary Street home.

Carlton answered the door nude and led police on a chase before she was taken into custody.

Bloomfield Town Marshal Kenny Tharp explained, "A (9-1-1) call came in from a lady who was requesting help. When Officer Shane Smith arrived he was met at the door by a nude, combative female. A physical altercation then incurred ... and she was taken into custody and incarcerated."

According to the probable cause affidavit filed in Greene County Circuit Court, at one point during the incident Carlton grabbed Officer Smith, attempted to flee and was eventually tasered in order to be subdued. Smith was assisted by Greene County Sheriff Deputy Chris McDonald and Worthington Officer Don Richardson.

Carlton was initially held at the Greene County Jail, but released after posting $1,500 bond the next day.

She was scheduled to appear in Greene Circuit Court last Friday morning for an initial hearing on preliminary charges of battery upon a law enforcement officer resulting in bodily injury, a class D felony; resisting law enforcement, a class A misdemeanor; and public nudity, a class D misdemeanor.

On Monday, an arrest warrant was issued because she missed the court date.

Anyone with information of the whereabouts of Carlton is asked to contact Indiana Conservation Officers at (812) 837-9536 or any local law enforcement agency.

Greene County Daily World Staff Writer Anna Rochelle contributed to this report.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable.

quote from article

"Indiana Conservation Officer's public information spokesman Max Winchell collaborated Sciscoe's version of what was observed."

I beleive Winchell turned things around for his own collaboration by the sounds of things.It looks to me where that is where the story changed.

My question though is, Now that they know that Winchell was wrong in his own collaboration, are they going to do something? like search, put some bulletins up in other counties? at least act like they care??? There are still people who haven't even heard this story! in our county! I beleive that everyone needs to be aware of this missing person report.

-- Posted by reb64 on Sat, Jul 26, 2008, at 6:01 AM

I beleive the police department should have sent her to a phsyc hospital for 72 hour observation to get her help after all she did call 911. are they going to form a search party or something? how sad!

-- Posted by reb64 on Wed, Jul 23, 2008, at 6:48 PM

MAYBE SHE COULDNT TALK OR WASNT AT HERSELF TO BE ABLE TO RESPOND??? WHO KNOWS ANYMORE, HOPE SHE WILL BE FOUND SAFE. THANKS TO THE PEOPLE WHO REPORTED SOMEONE IN THE RIVER, BUT WHO WAS IT? JUST WOW!!! I HOPE SHE TURNS UP SOON AN ALIVE,

-- Posted by susie on Wed, Jul 23, 2008, at 5:28 PM

well, it aint like she was a four wheeler.

-- Posted by america on Wed, Jul 23, 2008, at 3:01 PM

A Failure to Appear was reported locally as this lady who did not appear for court. Shame on us, why has a great effort not been organized to find this person's location or well-being? Are we so numb to the media's hype that we don't have any common sense anymore?

-- Posted by Frankie Ann on Wed, Jul 23, 2008, at 1:00 PM

If the only thing above water was the person's head how could they tell if they had on a life jacket or what color it was? When the river is moving swiftly and rising isn't it murky and dark?

-- Posted by bird fan on Wed, Jul 23, 2008, at 8:06 AM

I'd still like to know why there were conflicting reports regarding this. The newspaper article that originally mentioned this said witnesses saw a female floating in the river without any type of floatation device. This person claims that the person had a floatation device and they aren't sure if it was a male or female. Where did this conflict of stories come from, the eye witness or the Conversation Office?

Secondly, I find it hard to believe that people just hop in and float down the river, like her husband claims. What happens if someone catches a healthy current and before they know it they're a few miles downstream? Do they just find their way out of the water and walk home?

-- Posted by EggMan on Wed, Jul 23, 2008, at 7:51 AM

AT LEAST YOU REPORTED IT. THAT WAS A VERY IMPORTANT MOMENT.

-- Posted by tickedoff on Wed, Jul 23, 2008, at 2:52 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.

 
Mailing list
Enter your email address to join our daily headline mailing list: