|
Greene County, Indiana ~ Friday, October 10, 2008
| Blogs |
|
TRUST
Posted Tuesday, January 29, 2008, at 7:18 PM<< Previous | Read comments | Respond | Email link | Next >>
Back in the mid 90s, when my son was playing college ball, one of his coaches had what he called the "foxhole theory". Rate who on your team you would most likely want to be in your foxhole with you and who wouldn't you want. This goes along with that trust factor. Before I go any further, I am not equating being in a foxhole with being on the basketball court as far as importance -- I've been in both. It does, however, give a coach a way to measure how teammates feel about each other. A lot of times, by watching teams play, you can tell which ones trust each other. Rick Reilly of Sports Illustrated has a book called Hate Mail From Cheerleaders (I've had my share of hate thoughts from cheerleaders). In that book -- which is a collection of his articles from SI -- he has a passage entitled "My Team -- Your Team." Here are a few of his descriptions: Your Team is full of thugs, criminals and perverts..... My Team is colorful. Your Superstar is a selfish and arrogant narcissist who can't even stand his own teammates, much less his fans..... My Superstar is focused. Your Cheerleaders are uglier than the primates at the Tehran Zoo.... My Cheerleaders reject the old, chauvinistic notions of spirit leaders. Your Shortstop hasn't had a decent year since David Wells was a size medium..... My shortstop is primed for a breakout season. Your Pitcher is a headhunter...... My Pitcher controls the inside of the plate. Your Coach is a bloodthirsty, chair-heaving madman who ought to be handcuffed for emotionally and physically bullying his players and staff..... My Coach is old school. I think anyone who enjoys sports would like this book -- not that I've read it, but I do have it on audiotape. Sometimes we get too involved about why we want to root for or against somebody. Wouldn't it be nice to just once watch two teams suit up and enjoy good hard play. It wasn't long ago that many people in this area would attend games to watch Rusty Miller, the Graves boys, Brody Boyd, and Jared Rehmel play --with no allegiance to either team on the court. Comments Showing most recent comments first [Show in chronological order instead] |
Hot topics Take Me Out to the Ball Game(14 ~ 6:53 PM, Sep 11)
Welcome Back Joe
TOURNEY TIME
TRUST
Legends
Mailing list
Enter your email address to join our daily headline mailing list: |
one thing that came to mind on mr F's statment... I've seen lots of people buy fools gold --knowing it was fools gold... and tossing good rocks away because they were not as pretty but would have been with some polish.
ok decifer it yourself :)
I do not know if hard work always gets the most points in a game,but it is certainly easy to cheer for.Go Butler Bulldogs
I recall a recording engineer telling me once that "you can't polish a turd". While that is true, hard work still beats talent that won't work hard.
Hello, I am "playnice" and it is Sat. Feb 9, 2008 and that's the way it is." And you what, that is the way it is.
High school basketball coaches must play with the players they have ... at least that's the way it's supposed to be. I know a lot of coaches who know the game, and are great coaches, but don't have great players. Unfortunately, school boards don't always get it. They just look at the W-L record. A coach should be judged over the long haul ... five or six years, not three or four.
The bottom line should be how hard players play for a coach. If they don't play hard ... then there's a problem.
Maybe NO talent is a little extreme, but a team can win with little talent...or just one player with real talent.
Just gotta say it. I hope for the best for one of the best, Larry Hasler.He is a guy who played well, coached well, and followed that up by refereeing well, and oh so often. He is a referee and if you have been to a local sporting event you no doubt have seen him, yelled at him and then sometimes said he called a great game, when you win. Joe often speaks of him. I hear that Larry is not feeling well and I know that is putting it mildly. If you love local sports ya gotta say "come on Hass and get better."
Joe..Great Blog.. Thanks ;)
Joe, this is a little off of the subject but did think it worth mention. I was talking to Tom Oliphant today and and he talked of one of his dreams that he had the opportunity to realize, he had visited the Basketball Hall of Fame in Springfield Mass. He also visited the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown. He was surprized when he entered the Basketball Hall, to learn they start out by playing a film telling about the history of Basketball, and much to his surprize they had a piture of him, and the entire L&M team in the presentation. So if we ever get Tom to learn how to turn on a Computer maybe we can learn more of his life's journeys and maybe he will actually become involved in this way of communication.
I myself agree 100% I aint seen a good team that didnt have talent of some kind.
I've never seen a good team with no Talent. Many coaches like to flatter themselves by saying they could do that, but I've never seen it.
I guess it all depends on your definition of good.
couldnt agree with you more joe. trust goes beyond just players in one another but also they have to have trust in the coach as well.
and simmons, your statement about not having any talent on the team and not having a good team may be true, only if the coach doesnt possess any talent himself. all the good coaches can turn a team with "no talent" into a good team if there is trust and belief amongst the team. sometimes having a team full of talent is harder to work with than a team with no talent. if you are looking for another word, think about respect. respect is also needed from player to player coach to player and player to coach. if you think about it there are a lot of traits that go into a successful team starting with trust and respect, and none of which really have all that much to do with your talent factor
If you are looking at sports and many do and discuss their observations for life. It is a favorite point of conversation for my friends and I and sometimes complete strangers. There are things that most people agree on and one of them is trust, trust in one another and their motives. Hickory's fortunes changed dramatically when the population and players began to understand they could trust the coach as to his motives; was he in it all for himself or for the players,school, population, and the game.It became obvious he could be trusted to do what he believed was best for all and for the long run. I believe a necessary and essential ingredient in generating trust is ethics. Ethics seems to be the easiest thing for leaders to abandon on the road to that poison apple, winning at all costs. Ethics, doing the right thing, how easy to disregard when chasing a selfish goal. It is very difficult to achieve a long term goal without ethics. Perhaps one can cut a little corner here, and manage a situation occasionally to further a flawed cause looks like success but always ends in disaster. The news about sports today is all about ethics, it always has been. The names Lombardi, Landry, Stengel,Rockne, Wooden perhaps most of all, never mention ethics, they did not have to it was a taken.One could mention a host of those who did not follow this method and they live on in sports disgrace, the names not worth mention. I don't really care much for the analogy of sports and war, it is an easy one but war is different. I hate it that Joe was in a foxhole, except in training, I was in one also,in training and prayed I would never need one. Losing is not as bad in sports as it seems at the time, players talk lovingly of defeats in sports for life and often use these memories and lessons as a launching pad for their successes in life and it is inspiring. Back to ethics, doing the right thing. Learning the right from the good is an important lesson for life,and there-by sports. No coach or player is perfect and all of them know when they are doing right and many, all the good ones remember and learn from experiences of right and not right. There is also an E in Team and it stands for Ethics.
There's another similiarity between who'd you want on your team and in your foxhole. You want someone in both cases that is a good shooter.
Thanks for serving, Joe.
You are close Joe. The one word that you should have chosen begins with a T also, but it is not Trust, it is Talent. You can have all the Trust in the world, but if a Coach has a bunch of no-talented hooligans, who can't pass, dribble, shoot, rebound or play good defense, he's not going to have a good basketball team.
People will argue that they have seen many teams with a lot of Talent that weren't good basketball teams. True, but that is a coaching problem. What you will never see, is a good basketball team with no Talent. You just can't make a good steak out of cheap hamburger.
LOL maybe thats why most of the teams i've coached "sucked" Trust was always lacking; unless you consider the fact that "the fireman" was going to shoot anytime he got the ball no matter where he got the ball LOL!
I echo your sentiments on trust. Thinking back to successful teams on which I've played and those I've coached, it was there.
Also, the Reilly book IS very good - it will have you in tears of laughter and heartbreak from one story to the next.